Web Design & SEO Company

Web Design & SEO Company (http://www.tareeinternet.com/forum/)
-   Knowledgebase (http://www.tareeinternet.com/forum/knowledgebase/)
-   -   Superior SEO Web Design (http://www.tareeinternet.com/forum/knowledgebase/3514-superior-search-engine-optimization-web-design.html)

SEO ibiza 06-15-2009 12:17 PM

Superior SEO Web Design
 
Hi all, and especially amigo :)

Hope you'll bear with me on this one, I'm using the super-powerful Taree Internet domain in a little seo experiment.

I'd also like to discuss what separates truly superior seo web design from the rest and I think that given the performance of the Taree Internet domain in the SEO searches in general, and the superior sulumits retsambew entry in particular, this is the right place. (can you imagine the answers you'd get to this on DP? :) )

Admin 06-16-2009 12:00 PM

A Superior SEO Web Design is something i don't really have on TareeInternet. Speaking of the design i really have to give this place a new look soon. The forum is "ok" but the front end pages have all sorts of layout problems. It was my first attempt at trying to seamlessly design a Wordpress and vBulletin theme together so next one should be better.

With the front end i made the markup Valid xHTML Strict and the forum Valid xHTML Transitional. Although this doesn't directly effect SEO, i feel it's still a "good to do" thing to avoid any problems.

Also the home page i kept very light weight and fast loading, plus have good code to content ratio:

Quote:

Web Page Size :
6382 Bytes = 6 KB

Code Size :
4294 Bytes = 4 KB

Text Size :
2088 Bytes = 2 KB

Code to Text Ratio : 32.72 %
Only 4kb of markup and 6kb total page size which is tiny. The other thing i done was killed the stylesheets to view the raw page similar to what bots see and try to optimize the placement of important elements within the HTML. For instance, home page with all CSS zapped:

http://www.tareeinternet.com/forum/i...-webdesign.png

As you can see first thing is "SEO" in H1 as a clickable link pointing to home, followed by a secondary keyphrase in H2. These are a CSS image replacement so humans don't see this unless using a non-css capable browser or screen reader.

Then comes the menu, this is something i want to improve upon next design and put it beneath the content but make it appear at the top with CSS. This will put the important content much closer to the top. I done this with the side menu stuff, you can see the whole page here to get a better idea. Next version with hopefully be:

Main Title - H1
Secondary Title - H2
Page Content
Menus
Footer

The forums where much harder to do this with due to all the menu's and vBulletins use of tables instead of div's, however the new vB4 due out soon is supposed to be fully DIV/CSS based. So i'm waiting on that before making any more major design changes.

Well.. That's most of my Superior SEO Web Design tricks for TareeInternet. The forum i done more on, a lot of which was throwing a whole bucket load of default vB code in the trash. :D

SEO ibiza 06-20-2009 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin (Post 6765)
A Superior SEO Web Design is something i don't really have on TareeInternet. Speaking of the design i really have to give this place a new look soon. The forum is "ok" but the front end pages have all sorts of layout problems. It was my first attempt at trying to seamlessly design a Wordpress and vBulletin theme together so next one should be better.

so what's on Wordpress the main site?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin (Post 6765)
With the front end i made the markup Valid xHTML Strict and the forum Valid xHTML Transitional. Although this doesn't directly effect SEO, i feel it's still a "good to do" thing to avoid any problems.

Also the home page i kept very light weight and fast loading, plus have good code to content ratio:

Only 4kb of markup and 6kb total page size which is tiny.

Agreed, small fast loading pages are definitely a part of a superior SEO design. It's something we havent paid much (any) attention to really and just whack 350k .jpgs all over our own site through laziness basically.

but our site was built on a strong CSS / XHTML template by dcarter, (although extensively modified and de-validated in most places :) ) with the idea that if you can take a template and alter it and rank it as a demo, it could be (is) somebody else's site design we built the SEO content into.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin (Post 6765)
The other thing i done was killed the stylesheets to view the raw page similar to what bots see and try to optimize the placement of important elements within the HTML. For instance, home page with all CSS zapped:

http://www.tareeinternet.com/forum/i...-webdesign.png

As you can see first thing is "SEO" in H1 as a clickable link pointing to home, followed by a secondary keyphrase in H2. These are a CSS image replacement so humans don't see this unless using a non-css capable browser or screen reader.

Then comes the menu, this is something i want to improve upon next design and put it beneath the content but make it appear at the top with CSS. This will put the important content much closer to the top. I done this with the side menu stuff, you can see the whole page here to get a better idea. Next version with hopefully be:

Main Title - H1
Secondary Title - H2
Page Content
Menus
Footer

This is definitely important, nearly all the WP "sniper" themes you see have the primary KW in an H1 as the first thing on the page via a lynx viewer.

We had a good look at this on choosing the HTML template but ultimately decided that as the nav was going to be kw based, reading the nav with a whole load of kw links to inner pages targeting the terms was probably ok too.

and not presenting the onpage content first doesnt seem to hurt us.

I tend to just view the google cache with "text only" selected for the view youve shown there.

http://www.seoibiza.com/style/cache.jpg

we basically set the site up with the intention of each and every static sub page ranking for it's own terms eventually, right up to the main domain for "SEO" and "Ibiza" separately, and for most of the static site we do now.

Then we feed in extra content as required via the blog to supplement, and build up layers of thematic content around the topic.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin (Post 6765)
The forums where much harder to do this with due to all the menu's and vBulletins use of tables instead of div's, however the new vB4 due out soon is supposed to be fully DIV/CSS based. So i'm waiting on that before making any more major design changes.

ah now there's some advanced stuff going on on the forum isnt there? :) for example my title on this post was "superior seo web design" ..

yet the URL reads:

/knowledgebase/3514-superior-search-engine-optimization-web-design.html

phrase based url rewriting? :) or is that just standard forum tricks?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin (Post 6765)
Well.. That's most of my Superior SEO Web Design tricks for TareeInternet. The forum i done more on, a lot of which was throwing a whole bucket load of default vB code in the trash. :D

I think the forum and the site look really nice, I like the big text and the look of accessibility and cleanliness youve achieved, nice easy clear to read content, and yet massive rankings in the big phrases. I mean youre still mooching about in the US top 20 for "SEO" without doing any work on it for like 2 years now?

and you dont think you have a superior seo web design going on here?

lolwut? :)

visual 06-21-2009 07:55 AM

Using Header tags in the website content is very important for an SEO.

Admin 06-21-2009 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEO ibiza (Post 6892)
so what's on Wordpress the main site?

Yes all the main pages are WP, aka the homepage and everything up in the big top menu except the "SEO Forum" link. There's also a few WP pages that aren't linked from the sitewide header navigation. In other words, a sculpting that doesn't employ nofollow because i knew Cuttsy would turn around one day and say opps guess what? :D

The funny thing is, every one of those pages like this one are a toolbar PR5 just the same as the sitewide ones. I've always been a fan of smart linking to funnel importance rather than using nofollow.

Quote:

It's something we havent paid much (any) attention to really and just whack 350k .jpgs all over our own site through laziness basically.
Have i got a tool for you: http://smush.it

It's made by the guys from the Yahoo Performance Team, it crushes images a ton without messing with the image quality. One click and you can compress every image on the page. I use this tool extensively, almost every image on this site in the design and in posts has been done with it.

If you install the Firefox plugin and it still points to their old .com and doesn't work let me know, because i unpacked the Firefox .xpi file and fixed the javascript and packed it back up so it works with the correct domain.

Quote:

and not presenting the onpage content first doesnt seem to hurt us.
No it's working well, and actually your site has uncanny similarities with this one in regards to a more static front, a more dynamic internal section (yours is the blog, mine the forum) plus the raw text version is similar except for the links up top.
Quote:

ah now there's some advanced stuff going on on the forum isnt there? :) for example my title on this post was "superior seo web design" ..

yet the URL reads:

/knowledgebase/3514-superior-search-engine-optimization-web-design.html

phrase based url rewriting? :) or is that just standard forum tricks?
Oops caught! :D

Yeah there's a bunch of rewriting, stemming and other monkey business going on. But to be honest the implementation isn't as "smart" as i would like, for instance that particular replacement resulted in a URL that IMHO is too long and would of been better left as just "SEO".

I done it when i put the forum up at the start of 07, but if i done it again today i would do it much better.. For example the character length doesn't take in to account this part of the URL:

tareeinternet.com/forum/knowledgebase/

In the SEO section it pans out ok because i get /seo/ for the category, then the long version in the threads URL so it doesn't doubt up with "SEO" twice in the URL. But it does still work ok, just not as clever as i like.

Quote:

I think the forum and the site look really nice, I like the big text and the look of accessibility and cleanliness youve achieved, nice easy clear to read content, and yet massive rankings in the big phrases. I mean youre still mooching about in the US top 20 for "SEO" without doing any work on it for like 2 years now?
Thanks, i kind of got it right but the whole thing was a bit rushed. I done everything in one go, a day and the best part of the night then threw it live without checking different browsers/resolutions because i was asleep at the keyboard lol. So it is borked in some browsers, and with a horizontal scroller at some resolutions.

Quote:

and you dont think you have a superior seo web design going on here?

lolwut? :)
I guess, i have done a bit to the forum under the surface i'm not to sure Google even see's it as a forum. I have de-footprinted it a bit, like no box down below saying "vB Code is On" and icon keys, jump menus etc like normal forums.

Google has been buggy with this site the past week, notice how this isn't showing for Superior SEO Web Design after so long? However Google Alerts pinged me 30 minutes after you posted this.

Unrelated note, DP's PR just fell to PR4. :p

SEO ibiza 06-21-2009 07:43 PM

I did notice it was a little slow to assess it and show it, they indexed quick enough, although it's there now.

and lol @ DP.. whoops :) they were a 7 a year or so back.

SEO ibiza 06-23-2009 11:09 AM

Personally I think the single most important thing you do to a site (apart from pagetitles) is get the internal linkage, weighting and anchors correct.

obviously at the design stage is the time to do this. IMO superior seo design is all about getting the site structure and architecture right (and scalable!) from the beginning so that you can go all the way to the top.

it starts earlier than that of course, the kw research should be fully understood before you even register a domain name, because in the earlier stages that will play a large part in any specific kw performance. (not because of domain weighting of course, but because of IBL anchors if you have right name)

guess what our ultimate keyword/s are? (...hey how come you outrank us for "SEO"? :) )

superior seo design my old son ;)

Front Page Rankings 06-23-2009 09:05 PM

Superior SEO Web Design
 
Maybe I'm missing something here when it comes to superior SEO web design.

Yes, architecture is important (critical) but if you're going after a particular term I believe I've already proven that content still is King. How can you promote the "single most important thing" when I still have the #1 spot for the term and, at least by your own report, my site sucks for SEO?

I know that a freakin' boat load of content ain't easy. It's not as "elegant" as some solutions, but an avalanche is still an avalanche and it's damn hard to overcome with finesse. (ever tried to dance out of a tsunami?)

Perhaps I have this all wrong. It could very well be that my head is firmly impeding the flow from my anal orifice. Could even be that I have no idea what-so-ever what I'm talking about.

I only have one question... why am I still at #1 for the term?

Help me here guys, when it comes down to it, what does superior SEO web design really mean if it doesn't mean ranking #1?

SEO ibiza 06-23-2009 10:24 PM

lol. hi Tim.

you havent been watching SERPs for very long have you?

they move you know. :D

a #1 ranking for a week or two is not exactly unassailable and its not like putting a couple of blog posts up is a concerted effort to win it back either.

"content is king" is the biggest cliche in the book and means different things to everybody you talk to, but youre the first I've known use the phrase to mean that bucketloads of it is king :)

I dont think you'd find many pro SEOs who would agree with you that 10k of repetitive words that aren't designed to be read by real people is what Google mean by that.

IMO what it actually means is that if your content is good enough, people will link to you and then you rank.

if you think you have the answer however, please do feel free to demonstrate it's use say here business seo ?

or here search engine optimization facts

or here small business seo web design

I promise you dumping bucketloads of rehashed text and repeating the phrase 180 times in various <h's> wont work in those places.

and check Business SEO Scotland :) funny.

Front Page Rankings 06-23-2009 10:52 PM

still trying...
 
working on superior SEO now (already #4, which can't be seen as too bad!)

but the one that I actually want to take is one that is really getting traffic, we'll see how that goes and, of course, I'll let you know how that works out. When I get the #1 for my next target we'll see if you can take it back.

Never-the-less, it is fun, just being here. I know I'm new, inexperienced and know next to nothing, however, it seems like most of what I'm doing is getting results, so all I can do is keep on doing it. After all, if it works, it's pretty hard to knock, isn't it? (or is it... LOL)

Thanks again for inviting me, it's a real honor even to have you guys talk to me... I appreciate having your insight and knowing that even though you're laughing at me, at least you're still talking.

all the very best,

TN

SEO ibiza 06-23-2009 11:09 PM

hey it's only the twitter bragging that's funny. I believe the day will come when you will look back and wince at that and am just trying to save you the future embarassment ;)

and I think you'd agree we did have a valid point that may have already saved you some "attention" that you removed on pointing out?

re traffic and "seo converting phrases" i'll let you in on a secret, 60% ish of our serious enquiries through the site have been based around "seo packages" and variations.

"SEO" itself just raises your spam levels and link requests.

SEO ibiza 06-23-2009 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Front Page Rankings (Post 7004)
Maybe I'm missing something here when it comes to superior SEO web design.

I only have one question... why am I still at #1 for the term?

Help me here guys, when it comes down to it, what does superior SEO web design really mean if it doesn't mean ranking #1?

I suppose the crux of this is that you dont really understand why you are, or do you?

you're #1 because you basically aimed your whole site at it, and nobody else has optimised for it. it's a longtail, 5 hits a year term, and non-scalable if its your index page.

it's like this search, it's a crossover term hadnt even thought about that I just found while flicking around looking for examples superior business design service

if someone wants that, it's entirely possible to come take it away, and it's not an achievement. SEO at any greater than entry level is against people who are trying.

and you still definitely need to remove this from your examples of ranking prowess

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

click this to see why this is not a result to be bragging about ;)

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

you know SEO has a bad enough name anyway, and youre openly admitting you're brand new here, yet selling SEO services and touting yourself as an expert on twitter?

dude good luck and all that, everyone has to start somewhere, but I just cant help feeling your strategy for longetivity is flawed.

your credibility will be shot long before you ever get ranking high enough to earn any money from it, and credibility is worth far more than most websites.

in your early days you should focus on one or two really good reference sites, even if you do them for nothing just for the exposure, and referrals from happy customers. more than 80% of our work to date has come that route and credibility is all important there.

SEO ibiza 06-24-2009 12:34 AM

without blowing our own trumpet too much.. (because that's a bit distasteful ;) ) I would say the seo design principles we've followed from the beginning have enabled the kind of crossover performance shown below at this later date.

but it was the title changes you prompted that actually caused them though

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...G=Search&meta=

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

notice the lack of "SEO" there? (kind of ironic huh? :) )

so bearing in mind our site is only one year ahead of you in age, do you think your design will be as broadly spread across the serp as we are in 12 months time?

this is what our site was doing at the 7 months stage http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/06...design-update/

do you think yours is comparable?

SEO ibiza 06-24-2009 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEO ibiza (Post 7010)

re traffic and "seo converting phrases" i'll let you in on a secret, 60% ish of our serious enquiries through the site have been based around "seo packages" and variations.

as if by magic (woopra) this morning this search

http://www.google.com/search?q=busin...0&hl=en&num=10

lead to a phone enquiry, we're in discussion with them.

Front Page Rankings 06-24-2009 02:13 PM

I guess the rhetorical questions are out of order here?
 
LOL,

thanks again guys.

I'll tone it down a bit... already have a few sites doing well for the clients, so I'm all right there.

Thanks again for all the suggestions.

With much appreciation.

TN

Admin 06-24-2009 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEO ibiza (Post 6991)
IMO superior seo design is all about getting the site structure and architecture right (and scalable!) from the beginning so that you can go all the way to the top.

it starts earlier than that of course, the kw research should be fully understood before you even register a domain name, because in the earlier stages that will play a large part in any specific kw performance.

Exactly, couldn't of said it better myself. I'm a firm believer in launching the thing as a fully optimized website from day one. People go on about things like the sandbox, new sites cannot perform etc but typically the reason is the SEO is half baked.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Front Page Rankings (Post 7004)
Maybe I'm missing something here when it comes to superior SEO web design.

Yes, architecture is important (critical) but if you're going after a particular term I believe I've already proven that content still is King.

The king with Google is inbound links and anchor text, the Google algo is heavily link biased because they can compute and score links however them understanding and scoring content is a fair way off. You can rank a page with no content but it's damn hard to rank a page with no links. A good example is the term "Click Here" and you will see Adobe even has sitelinks for the term but it appears nowhere on the page.

Content is queen, it pulls links so yes the pair work together.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Front Page Rankings (Post 7009)
working on superior SEO now (already #4, which can't be seen as too bad!)

but the one that I actually want to take is one that is really getting traffic, we'll see how that goes and, of course, I'll let you know how that works out. When I get the #1 for my next target we'll see if you can take it back.

it seems like most of what I'm doing is getting results, so all I can do is keep on doing it. After all, if it works, it's pretty hard to knock, isn't it? (or is it... LOL)

That's exactly right. At the end of the day, the only thing that counts is results. It doesn't matter what the keyword/phrase or competition, if it pulls traffic that engage in a positive action (Sale, Signup, Member, RSS Subscriber etc) you are almost at the finish line. The other part is cost per acquisition, if it costs $1 per converting visitor to obtain but you gain $2 per converting visitor it's a done deal.

I decided one day to rank here in #4, above the people in the industry i look up to and 3 months later i did. It may seem like an excellent result, but it wasn't because the converting traffic sucked and the cost/effort to maintain it wasn't justified so i dropped the term.

If you're ranking for 5 word long tails which cost peanuts to acquire, and it's bringing conversions you are doing the right thing. ;)

Quote:

Thanks again for inviting me, it's a real honor even to have you guys talk to me... I appreciate having your insight and knowing that even though you're laughing at me, at least you're still talking.

all the very best,

TN
Thanks for joining, and welcome to the forum. :)

PS Amigo, did you notice the strange toolbar export today? For instance the first page of this thread is PR5, Google has been really buggy lately.

SEO ibiza 06-24-2009 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin (Post 7043)

PS Amigo, did you notice the strange toolbar export today? For instance the first page of this thread is PR5, Google has been really buggy lately.

I noticed last night that an 11 day old blog post had gone PR2. internals only that I can see, no domain changes whatsoever.

(apart from DP :) )

ps. lol @ PR5, if that's real I may end up regretting starting this thread :)

SEO ibiza 06-24-2009 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin (Post 7043)

Content is queen, it pulls links so yes the pair work together.

I still think we need to define "content"

are we talking about just the onpage body text? as you said you can rank a page with no content of this type, or you can rank a page even better with a highly optimized "seo html framework" ie site structure, correct link weightings, pagetitles etc and virtually no onpage content.

we've been experimenting with this at length the last year or so here

in conclusion it seemed that the richer the onpage content, the more stable the rankings, but it didnt seem to make very much difference with how high it up would go.

so my point is how do you separate structure from content, when in fact the onpage content is more or less interchangeable when the page framework is right?

"content is king" is inaccurate IMO. from a rankings POV "SEO content is king" ;)
http://www.optimize-my-ass.com/wp-co...ng-content.jpg

SEO ibiza 06-25-2009 03:15 PM

Back to the Topic..
 
Ok so back on track. so the likely list of site desirable traits we have so far fora superior seo web design project is:
  1. keyword research at concept stage
  2. domain name choice, / directory / filenames (stemming & theming)
  3. correct site structure / architecture / scalability
  4. correct link weighting nav and content
  5. small file sizes HTML & images
  6. fast loading (speed does matter)
when this is all in place, then you think about killer king content and the standard onpage stuff.

what have I missed?

Admin 06-26-2009 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEO ibiza (Post 7044)
I noticed last night that an 11 day old blog post had gone PR2. internals only that I can see, no domain changes whatsoever.

(apart from DP :) )

ps. lol @ PR5, if that's real I may end up regretting starting this thread :)

It's real, however if Pagerank = Rank then you would regret it. Pretty funny though that this thread you started buried deep in the site has a higher PR than DP's homepage.;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEO ibiza (Post 7078)
Ok so back on track. so the likely list of site desirable traits we have so far for a superior seo web design project is:
  1. keyword research at concept stage
  2. domain name choice, / directory / filenames (stemming & theming)
  3. correct site structure / architecture / scalability
  4. correct link weighting nav and content
  5. small file sizes HTML & images
  6. fast loading (speed does matter)
when this is all in place, then you think about killer king content and the standard onpage stuff.

what have I missed?

That pretty much sums it up. Also on the small file sizes, you could extend the HTML & Images to all scripts like minified/compressed CSS and Javascript and also limit the usage of non-friendly scripting/ajax/flash.

Also i guess we could add clean semantic and minimal markup, using things like ALT for images, meaningful class names, simple <li> based menus and keeping content and presentation separate. At the moment (according to Matt) Google doesn't care if you use tables or pretty CSS but Google has made it known they are moving towards microformats, rich snippets and structure to understand the web rather than just index/retrieve it.

I guess there's a lot of other things, but they all melt in to the core list you mentioned.

Oh yeah, i just made some changes to the forum based on Matt's change of Nofollow information. Nothing like using your own site as a testbed, actually i have several others running but getting data from this site is easier due to a bit more authority flowing around.

Have you done any testing on the Nofollow/Evaporation claims? If so any results yet?

SEO ibiza 06-26-2009 08:57 PM

hola. youre back :)

lol I test everything on my site first too, it's working pretty well, but the work just keeps coming via referrals so if we bombed it, it wouldn't matter much. just give us the chance to reverse back out of another filter :)

so I deactivated the plugin we were running on the blog yesterday that implemented the deep PR push, and as the blogs dofollow for operational reasons anyway comment nofollows have never been an issue.

(spam neither funnily enough, no more than most blogs dofollow or not)

but it's too soon to know anything. the static site Im leaving the same until we see what happens.

what did you do here?

Admin 06-26-2009 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEO ibiza (Post 7122)
what did you do here?

When you are logged in you won't notice any difference. However for logged out users (aka Googlebot) i threw a heap of links/code in the bin. From memory in threads there's now just 3 Nofollow links in the design and one on each username link.

Then on the category pages, there's 2 in the design and one on each username link. Then the forum homepage, there's 3 in the design and one on each username link.

Before there was i think about 10 in the design on each page, plus however many username links on each page. So i've trimmed out a fairly decent number of nofollow's on every page, i could go lower (even eliminate them completely) but it will start to impact usability so i will leave it at that for now. I'm not really concerned about any ranking gains, it's just one of many ongoing tests to see what happens if i poke it with a stick. :)

A part of me thinks Matt is blowing smoke a little and there's more to this Nofollow implementation than he can let on.

Admin 06-26-2009 10:29 PM

Here's a small sample of what i changed:

http://i42.tinypic.com/14bu59t.png

As you can see the top version has 6 nofollow links, plus the three arrows which drop down other links like Threaded and Hybrid views, Print Versions etc which were all Nofollow.

The bottom version is now what Google sees, zero links. I figure if people want to sort the posts by Rating, Views, Replies or see the threads in other ways like Threaded views they can register to gain those options. So just those few square inches killed about a dozen Nofollow's without really hurting usability.

There was a ton of other places i took an axe to the code, but that's just an example of what i done.

SEO ibiza 06-26-2009 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin (Post 7126)

A part of me thinks Matt is blowing smoke a little and there's more to this Nofollow implementation than he can let on.

seems theres some people think that might be possible

Evaporating PR & PageRank Sculpting

so with regards to the changes, removing links makes the remaining links offpage stronger and hence the pages being linked to stronger, so chopping them out nofollow or not is probably going to help anyway no?

Im thinking I might actually just remove every link that was nofollowed on the static site, but leave the text identical on the site to see what happens.

if nothing changes.. well.. hmm.. :)

SEO ibiza 07-01-2009 12:43 PM

Amigo.

what do you see here, 2 different results like I do, depending on whether the "seo" is capitalized or not?

google.com/search?q=superior++seo&pws=0

google.com/search?q=superior+SEO&pws=0

almost seem to have no real idea what others are seeing in far off serps these days..

edit
serp aligned the next day

ruselrones 09-14-2009 06:12 AM

Hi,

SEO Web Design is the process of designing SEO into a site’s structure, and is fundamental to superior SERP performance. The art is to start with the pormance required and reverse-engineer the necessary SEO into the website.superior SEO web design should have considered and implemented the principles.keyword research at concept stage,correct site structure / scalability,correct link weighting nav and content.

visual 09-14-2009 08:12 PM

Seo
 
Relevant keywords & relevant site are the main things in which we should focus on it.

SEO ibiza 10-19-2009 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruselrones (Post 8705)
Hi,

SEO Web Design is the process of designing SEO into a site’s structure, and is fundamental to superior SERP performance. The art is to start with the pormance required and reverse-engineer the necessary SEO into the website.

hmm. that looks a bit similar to this? from here - http://superior-seo.us/ ? :)
Quote:

Superior SEO Web Design

SEO Web Design is the process of designing SEO into a site’s structure, and is fundamental to superior SERP performance. The art is to start with the performance / results required and reverse-engineer the necessary SEO into the website.
Quote:

Originally Posted by ruselrones (Post 8705)
superior SEO web design should have considered and implemented the principles.keyword research at concept stage,correct site structure / scalability,correct link weighting nav and content.

and this from this ? from here? http://superior-seo.us/web-design/
Quote:

A superior SEO web design should have considered and implemented the following principles:
  • keyword research at concept stage.
  • domain name choice, / directory / filenames (stemming & theming)
  • correct site structure / architecture / scalability
  • correct link weighting nav and content

but thanks for your input anyway ;)

Admin 10-21-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEO ibiza (Post 9197)
hmm. that looks a bit similar to this? from here - http://superior-seo.us/ ? :)

Indeed, and it also appears "ruselrones" tripped over the ban button on the way out the door, which in turn knocked his spammy "Nintendo" signature out of his top pocket.

Tragic turn of events really, i hope he gets well soon. :D


Forum time zone is GMT. Currently it's 01:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.